In the lead up to the Ontario provincial election on February 27, 2025, the Tri-Cities Transport Action Group (TriTAG) sent out a questionnaire for MPP candidates in Waterloo Region to understand their positions on key issues around transit and active transportation. In partnership with several groups, we also asked a question about inter-municipal transit for candidates in Waterloo Region as well as Brantford—Brant, Guelph, and Wellington—Halton Hills.

The responses are ordered by riding under each question theme:

• Inter-municipal Transit
• ION Stage 2 LRT
• Bike Lanes
• Kitchener GO
• Municipal Transit Operations Funding

Inter-municipal Transit

These questions on inter-municipal transit are on behalf of TriTAG as well as Transit Action Alliance of Guelph, Conestoga Students Inc, and More Transit Southern Ontario. They were posed to candidates in ridings covering Waterloo Region, Guelph, and Brantford.

There are currently no direct transit connections between Brantford and Waterloo Region, and limited, weekday-only service between Kitchener-Waterloo and Guelph. Meanwhile, Cambridge and Guelph have no transit connections, despite being less than 20 minutes apart by car.

A. Would you press Metrolinx to provide frequent daily service connecting Brantford, Cambridge, Guelph, and Kitchener-Waterloo through GO Transit?

B. Would you support providing provincial funding to Grand River Transit, Guelph Transit, and/or Brantford Transit to provide inter-municipal transit links?

Guelph

Candidate	Party	A	B	Extra comments
Mike Schreiner	Green	Yes	Yes	Mike has been central to advocating for public transit improvements.
Cameron Spence	New Democratic	Yes	Yes
Mustafa Zuberi	Liberal	Yes	Yes	This is a great initiative! We not only need mass transit to connect these regions, we also need rapid transit in the future to further connect these regions along with the GTA. Yours truly, Mustafa Zuberi.

Brantford-Brant

Candidate	Party	A	B	Extra comments
Harvey Bischof	New Democratic	Yes	Yes	The Ontario NDP has committed to re-assuming 50% of the operating cost of municipal transit. By itself, this should assist municipal systems in expanding inter & municipal transit but I'm also willing to press further for greater linkage between the municipalities.
Joshua Carron	New Blue Party	Yes	Yes	With tax-payer at the foremost concern, when we cut enough other wasteful spending to find room to fully fund this vital transportation need.
Mike Clancy	None of the Above Direct Democracy Party	Yes	Yes	That's not good enough. Subsidized transit morning, noon and night is required from Simcoe to Six Nations to Brantford to Paris to Cambridge. All day subsidized train connections are required from Woodstock or Kitchener to Brantford and Hamilton. This must be at a low fare. Add to this free local transit. These connections are needed for family, business and medical connections. An electric train line must be built connecting Niagara Falls, Windsor and Sarnia to take heavy freight trucks off our highways. Our air quality suffers from connecting American cities.
Karleigh Csordas	Green	Yes	Yes	This is a very important topic for me. I went to University of Waterloo for school and would need to bus to cambridge, then to Mississauga and back to Brantford... We need to invest in our public transportation system for many reasons...convenience for students, workers, transports of supplies + goods and to ensure we can save money by saving energy. I will ensure to highlight the needs for this on my social media accounts in the upcoming week to ensure I can advocate and firmly stand to take an active role in being part of bringing inter-municipal transit links. thank you!
Ron Fox	Liberal	Yes	Yes	We need to look at how the Province can assist in ensuring transit is available between counties and municipalities. That is a concern I heard multiple times when chatting with Brant county residents. Whether through a shared services deal, or some other system, if there is a need and a desire, we need to look at what can be done to serve the public. I would also like to see all day Go Train service into the Brantford Brant area. Our population has grown dramatically- and it will continue to grow. I believe we can support Go Train service, that it would take many vehicles off the road, easy congestion and helping the environment.

Wellington—Halton Hills

Candidate	Party	A	B	Extra comments
Alex Hilson	Liberal	Yes	Yes	Improved transit connections are going to be a more and more important issue as Ontario continues to grow. I have experience on the Town of Halton Hills Active Transportation Committee and - when I was younger, living in small community without transit and not owning my own car - I experienced first-hand some of the gaps our transit systems face. Recognizing the role of Metrolinx, residents and municipalities and the need for a full conversation on the topic, I am happy to advocate for better connectivity through inter-municipal transit links.
Simone Kent	New Democratic	Yes	Yes	The NDP will work to connect Ontario’s communities with a comprehensive, integrated, reliable, convenient, and affordable intercity bus and rail passenger transportation network, so people will finally have a real choice when traveling between different cities and towns across Ontario.
Bronwynne Wilton	Green	Yes	Yes	It is one of the Green Party's platformed priorities to establish a clean, affordable, accessible, intercity EV bus services to connect rural communities.

Cambridge

Candidate	Party	A	B	Extra comments
Rob Deutschmann	Liberal	Yes	Yes
Carla Johnson	Green	Yes	Yes	Public transit is great. Cambridge and Ayr are especially isolated. We really felt it when Greyhound folded. It would make things so much better for people to have public transit options to Guelph and Brantford and beyond.

Kitchener Centre

Candidate	Party	A	B	Extra comments
Aislinn Clancy	Green	Yes	Yes	Yes. I have an existing relationship with Metrolinx and I believe that the province has downloaded too many costs down to municipalities, and I will continue to call for provincial funding in building inter-municipal transit in the region.
Colleen James	Liberal	Yes	Yes
Paul Simoes	New Blue Party	No	No	Without a detailed assessment of the financial implications and projected benefits of such transit expansions, it would be prudent to withhold support for these initiatives. Any consideration of funding or service expansion should be based on comprehensive studies demonstrating clear economic and social advantages for the communities involved.
Brooklin Wallis	New Democratic	Yes	Yes

Kitchener South—Hespeler

Candidate	Party	A	B	Extra comments
Jeff Donkersgoed	New Democratic	Yes	Yes	We will make commuting across the region more affordable, reliable, and convenient by expanding intercity bus and rail transit.
Ismail Mohamed	Liberal	Yes	Yes	Supporting our local transit operators is necessary, and we know how key it is to provide investment to improve service availability. We will be committed to improving services among our regional networks. For over 15 years, we have seen a number of mandates that have included promises for enhancing service for residents in the Region of Waterloo. These transit projects are long overdue - our province is growing considerably, and the region is expected to surpass 1-million citizens by 2050. In order to accommodate the need for travel among Brantford, Cambridge and Hespeler, Guelph, and Kitchener-Waterloo, we need to provide that investment to increase service and we are ready to do so. As for the GO Transit issue - the provincial government has done a poor job at representing and standing up for the issues of our community. Service should be frequent and consistent to ensure people can get from their homes to the places they need in a timely manner, and the state of GO Transit in our region does not reflect that. We also have to advocate for physical expansion into underserved areas of the region, beyond central Kitchener, that’s exactly what myself and my party colleagues will do.
John Soule	New Blue Party	Yes	No	Supporting GO Transit expansion between Brantford, Cambridge, Guelph, and Kitchener-Waterloo makes sense because Metrolinx is better equipped to manage intercity transit than local agencies. GO Transit provides consistent scheduling, a unified fare system, and efficient regional connections, avoiding fragmented service from multiple municipal operators. Funding local transit agencies like Grand River Transit, Guelph Transit, and Brantford Transit for inter-municipal links could lead to overlapping routes, inefficiencies, and inconsistent service levels. These agencies are primarily responsible for local transit, and inter-city expansion should be handled by a province-wide provider with the infrastructure to manage long-distance routes effectively. Additionally, municipal governments can fund their own inter-municipal transit if they see a need, rather than relying on provincial subsidies. Focusing on GO Transit ensures better regional service without redundant spending, making it a more cost-effective, streamlined, and reliable solution for improving transit across these cities.

Kitchener—Conestoga

Candidate	Party	A	B	Extra comments
Joe Gowing	Liberal	Yes	Yes	We need a provincial transit plan to connect all of Ontario.
Jodi Szimanski	New Democratic	Yes	Yes

Waterloo

Candidate	Party	A	B	Extra comments
Suja Biber	New Blue	Yes	Yes	1. **Regional Connectivity**: Highlight the importance of regional connectivity for economic growth and development. Frequent service between these cities will enhance access to jobs, education, and services across the region, supporting a more integrated economy. 2. **Public Demand**: Point out that there is a growing demand for reliable public transit options in the region. Increased service frequency would respond to the needs of residents who rely on transit for their daily commutes. 3. **Traffic Congestion Mitigation**: Emphasize that improved transit service can help reduce traffic congestion on major roadways. Encouraging more people to use public transit rather than personal vehicles will lessen the burden on transportation infrastructure. 4. **Environmental Benefits**: Discuss the positive environmental implications of providing better public transit options. Enhanced GO Transit services can contribute to lower greenhouse gas emissions and promote sustainable travel choices. 5. **Public Health Considerations**: Mention that increased public transit usage can lead to improved public health outcomes by reducing air pollution and encouraging more active lifestyles among citizens, such as walking or cycling to transit stops. 6. **Support for Commuters**: Advocate for services that cater to the diverse needs of commuters, including peak service times, affordable pricing, and accessibility options for those with disabilities. 7. **Investment in Infrastructure**: Encourage investment in transit infrastructure and facilities that would support this increased service, such as modern transit hubs, bike storage, and amenities that enhance the overall commuter experience. 8. **Advocacy for Funding**: Suggest that securing adequate funding from provincial and federal sources is essential for making this service a reality. Collaboration with government officials can facilitate the necessary financial support for expanding GO Transit routes. 9. **Enhanced Communication**: Stress the need for Metrolinx to engage in transparent communication with the public regarding service plans, timelines, and community impact. Keeping residents informed helps build trust and support for transit initiatives. 10. **Long-term Vision**: Encourage Metrolinx to adopt a long-term vision for regional transit that not only addresses current needs but also anticipates future growth and demand in the region.
Shefaza Esmail	Green	Yes	Yes	While I live in Kitchener, my place of work is in Hamilton and my family and family doctor are in Mississauga. We went car-free from June of last year and the biggest challenge for us has been inter-city transportation. I would very enthusiastically support and persistently advocate for provincial funding to ensure that people can connect easily from KW to Cambridge, Guelph, Brantford, and Hamilton. And ensure that current access to other major cities is available more frequently (e.g., weekend GO train to Toronto from Kitchener, two-way all day GO train).
Catherine Fife	New Democratic	Yes	Yes	Intercity public transit connects people to jobs, family and friends, healthcare and other important services and opportunities. An NDP government will work with municipalities, rail companies and local transit operators to connect Ontario’s communities together with a comprehensive, integrated, reliable, convenient and affordable intercity bus and rail passenger transportation network, so people will finally have a real choice when travelling between different cities and towns across Ontario. This includes expanding the GO bus and rail network, and improving the frequency and quality of its services outside the Toronto-area core.
Clayton Moore	Liberal	Yes	Yes	Waterloo Region is falling behind because the province hasn’t stepped up on inter-regional transit. We’ve built one of the strongest local transit systems of any city our size in North America, but the second you need to leave the region—whether it’s to Guelph, Brantford—a simple 30-minute trip can quickly turn into a three-hour ordeal. We’ve got to do better. The Ontario Liberals aren’t okay with this status quo, and neither am I. Frequent, reliable, and safe inter-regional transit isn’t a luxury—it should be the reality. As your MPP, I’ll push, facilitate, and demand that Waterloo gets the connectivity it deserves.

ION Stage 2 LRT

Planning for ION Stage 2 has been underway for years, and the latest cost estimates have tripled to $4.5 billion. Cost escalations have plagued transit projects across North America, and transit cost experts have identified hands-off procurement approaches as a major contributor.

A. Would you support the province providing funding—not contingent on requiring public-private partnership procurement—for the Region of Waterloo’s ION Stage 2?

B. Would you support the province providing funding for initial design planning and hands-on project management for ION Stage 2?

Cambridge

Candidate	Party	A	B	Extra comments
Rob Deutschmann	Liberal	Yes	Yes
Carla Johnson	Green	Yes	Yes

Kitchener Centre

Candidate	Party	A	B	Extra comments
Aislinn Clancy	Green	Yes	Yes	I have an existing relationship with the incumbent Minister of Transportation, and if the Ford government forms government again, I will continue to work across party lines, put people before politics to deliver for Kitchener Centre.
Colleen James	Liberal	Yes	Yes	The province for ION Phase 1 funding for the preliminary design and the EA to be done to their specifications. They would need to pay good part of it.
Paul Simoes	New Blue Party	No	Yes	I believe in fiscal responsibility and the efficient use of taxpayer dollars. Given the significant cost escalation to $4.5 billion, I am concerned about the financial viability and management of the project. I would support provincial funding for initial design planning and hands-on project management to ensure rigorous financial oversight and project efficiency. However, I would not support unconditional provincial funding without measures in place that can help control costs and mitigate financial risks.
Brooklin Wallis	New Democratic	Yes	Yes

Kitchener South—Hespeler

Candidate	Party	A	B	Extra comments
Jeff Donkersgoed	New Democratic	Yes	Yes	The Ontario NDP has committed to fund Phase 2 of the Waterloo ION LRT.
Ismail Mohamed	Liberal	Yes	Yes	Our Ontario Liberal Party has made it a policy priority to support the region in delivering LRT service to Cambridge. I’m not an expert, but I believe that the process of developing a strong LRT expansion plan needs to be transparent and accountable to our local governments and the community - working directly with the people that will be affected by its expansion. I know that communities, like the one I support at the Kingsdale community centre, are dependent on public transit to reach vital services, their place of work, their schools and post secondary education, and the grocery store. An expanded LRT would also relieve congestion from inter-city travel amongst our residents in the region, those who may want to visit amenities and small businesses just a city away. Better transit solutions and an LRT to improve inter-city transit in the region is long overdue, and we must be committed to supporting regional partners to ensure transparency and accountability every step of the way. The regional and municipal governments know what is best for the community, and I feel that while our province should provide that support and have involvement, it is necessary to make sure the decision-making is primarily made at the local level. In the Region of Waterloo, we are all very interconnected; students in Cambridge may attend post secondary in Waterloo, residents of Kitchener may need to get to their place of work in Cambridge - the bottom line is that we need to expand the LRT to improve the transit network and support the community.
John Soule	New Blue Party	No	No	The ION light rail transit (LRT) in Waterloo Region has been a costly failure, plagued by poor planning, massive disruptions, and underwhelming ridership. The project cost $868 million, yet it has failed to significantly improve public transportation. Ridership has struggled, with many residents continuing to rely on cars due to the ION’s limited reach and unreliable service. Construction lasted five years, devastating local businesses along King Street. Many never recovered from the loss of foot traffic. The ION has also worsened traffic congestion, as road layouts were permanently altered, creating frustrating bottlenecks. Service interruptions have been frequent, with mechanical failures, weather-related shutdowns, and accidents causing delays. Replacement buses during shutdowns are slow and unreliable, making the entire system inconvenient. Additionally, the fare system is poorly implemented, with confusing ticketing options and inconsistent enforcement, leading to fare evasion. Despite all these issues, officials continue pushing for a Cambridge extension projected to cost over $4.5 billion, raising serious concerns about wasting even more taxpayer money. The ION has been nothing more than an overpriced, ineffective transit experiment, proving to be a massive financial mistake with little to show for it.

Kitchener—Conestoga

Candidate	Party	A	B	Extra comments
Joe Gowing	Liberal	Yes	Yes	I believe we need to connect all of Ontario. The Province needs a transit plan.
Jodi Szimanski	New Democratic	Yes	Yes	With funding I would want to make sure that the process is transparent and efficient. Too many projects under Ford have not done this.

Waterloo

Candidate	Party	A	B	Extra comments
Suja Biber	New Blue	Yes	Yes	1. **Concerns Over Cost Escalation**: Express your concerns about the tripling of the estimated costs to $4.5 billion. This significant increase raises questions about budgeting, planning, and oversight in transit project management. 2. **Need for Accountability in Procurement**: Highlight the importance of implementing more rigorous procurement methods. Advocating for transparency and hands-on management can help mitigate similar cost overruns in the future. 3. **Importance of Public Trust**: Emphasize that maintaining public trust is crucial. Communities need to feel confident that their tax dollars are being used effectively. Clear communication about cost increases and project progress is essential. 4. **Impact on Future Transit Development**: Point out that the rising costs could impact the feasibility of future transit projects. It's vital to ensure that funding strategies are sustainable and that projects remain attainable within budget. 5. **Call for Community Engagement**: Suggest that community input should be sought during the planning stages. Engaging residents can provide valuable insights and enhance the project's alignment with community needs. 6. **Long-term Benefits vs. Short-term Costs**: While acknowledging current cost concerns, also reinforce the long-term benefits of a well-planned transit system, including reduced congestion, environmental benefits, and increased accessibility. 7. **Support for Alternatives**: Advocate for exploring alternative funding models or partnerships that could help offset costs. This may include public-private partnerships or additional state and federal funding. 8. **Focus on Timelines**: Stress the need for a realistic timeline for project completion. Delays can compound costs and erode public support for transit initiatives. By incorporating these points, your extra comments can provide a comprehensive perspective on ION Stage 2 LRT planning and highlight critical areas that require attention and action.
Shefaza Esmail	Green	Yes	Yes	I take the ION everyday to drop and pickup my daughter from daycare. We chose a location to live based on proximity to the ION. I love how the ION already spans two cities - from Waterloo to Kitchener, and I am excited about the extension to Cambridge. I met someone on the ION just before the election period who works in Cambridge but lives in Waterloo and has greatly benefited from the ION phase 1 and is looking forward to ION phase 2 - would rather have that than the tunnels under the 401. Public transit is a better way to ease traffic congestion and ensure people get where they need to in a fast, affordable, and safe way!
Catherine Fife	New Democratic	Yes	Yes	The costs of building rapid transit in Ontario have roughly tripled under the Ford government. A recent University of Toronto study identified the provincial government’s over-reliance on private consultants, private financing and other “soft costs” as main drivers of this cost escalation. The provincial government should fund the ION Stage 2 LRT, but must not make funding contingent on adopting the terrible practices of the secretive and consultant-captured Metrolinx and Infrastructure Ontario, including the forced use of P3 procurement.
Clayton Moore	Liberal	Yes	Yes	Absolutely—Stage 1 of the ION has already shown how reliable public transit improves mobility, drives economic growth, and supports sustainable development. Stage 2, which extends light rail to Cambridge, is the next step in ensuring the entire Region of Waterloo benefits from these advantages. Investing in the ION isn’t just about Cambridge—it strengthens transit connectivity across the region, making it easier and safer for people to get to work, support local businesses, visit family, and access essential services like healthcare and groceries. Reliable transit reduces congestion, cuts road maintenance costs, and supports our climate goals—all while making our cities more livable. The province should be a committed partner in funding Stage 2—not contingent on a public-private partnership—so we can build a system that works best for the people who rely on it.

Bike Lanes

Bill 212 will be removing several bike lanes on major streets in Toronto and is requiring municipalities to get provincial approvals if they want to remove lanes in order to put in bike infrastructure.

Do you believe municipalities should need per-project provincial approvals to build safe, protected bike infrastructure where it may require reductions in car lanes?

Cambridge

Candidate	Party	Response	Extra comments
Rob Deutschmann	Liberal	No
Carla Johnson	Green	No	Bike lanes reduce congestion and each municipality should be encouraged and supported to decide where and when they are needed. Removing existing bike lanes is appalling. This provincial gov't needs to get back to taking care of the province instead of wrecking all the good work people are doing at the local level.

Kitchener Centre

Candidate	Party	Response	Extra comments
Aislinn Clancy	Green	No	HARD NO. I was very vocal on this as incumbent MPP, in the legislature and at the protests in Toronto. I bike to Queen's Park from Union Station when I commute to Toronto, this is absolute government overreach into municipalities, disregard for data, and dismantling safe cycling infrastructure that is sustainable and puts less cars on the roads.
Colleen James	Liberal	No	I think bike lanes are a municipal /regional councils and community discussion. This is outside of the purview of the province and should remain as such.
Paul Simoes	New Blue Party	Yes	It is important to uphold provincial authority as outlined in the Canadian Constitution and the province's role in overseeing and regulating matters that may have broader implications beyond local jurisdictions. Requiring municipalities to obtain provincial approval for projects that significantly alter transportation infrastructure, such as reducing car lanes for bike infrastructure, ensures that such decisions align with provincial standards and consider the interests of all road users. We must aim to balance local initiatives with provincial oversight to maintain consistency and address potential impacts on traffic flow and safety across the province.
Brooklin Wallis	New Democratic	No

Kitchener South—Hespeler

Candidate	Party	Response	Extra comments
Jeff Donkersgoed	New Democratic	Yes
Ismail Mohamed	Liberal	Yes	The Ontario Liberal Party and myself personally believe that the introduction of Bill 212 was an irresponsible overstep by the PC provincial government. We have bike lanes and protected infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists for a reason, they are taking a risk in unprotected roadways, and need the infrastructure to keep them safe. This infrastructure is also important for promoting safe and sustainable transportation that can help to reduce congestion. The fact that a PC government that was so vocal about reducing bureaucracy created a ministry dedicated to reducing red tape, then increased red tape in active transportation projects that are meant to protect our citizens, is telling. As with all transit and planning - the cities know best, but our Ontario Liberal Party would be there to support them where needed. In our region, I have watched Waterloo take the lead for effective, fun, and safe active transportation and I hope that Kitchener and Cambridge follow-suit.
John Soule	New Blue Party	Yes

Kitchener—Conestoga

Candidate	Party	Response	Extra comments
Joe Gowing	Liberal	No	Municipalities should be able and free to make their own city plans.
Jodi Szimanski	New Democratic	No	As long as there is transparency in the process, public meetings and discourse, then this should be left to the municipalities.

Waterloo

Candidate	Party	Response	Extra comments
Suja Biber	New Blue	Yes	1. **Support for Active Transportation**: Emphasize the importance of active transportation options, such as biking, in creating a sustainable and healthy urban environment. Highlight the benefits of bike lanes for reducing traffic congestion and promoting emissions-free commuting. 2. **Concerns Over Reduced Infrastructure**: Express your concerns about the removal of bike lanes on major streets in Toronto. Highlight how this could negatively impact cyclists' safety and discourage bike usage, ultimately hindering efforts to increase cycling as a viable transportation option. 3. **Need for Local Autonomy**: Advocate for municipal autonomy in making decisions about local infrastructure. Local governments are better positioned to understand and address the specific needs of their communities, and the requirement for provincial approval may hinder timely and effective decision-making. 4. **Encouraging Community Engagement**: Suggest that community input should be solicited when making decisions about bike lanes and infrastructure changes. Engaging residents can lead to more informed decisions that reflect the desires of the community. 5. **Call for Comprehensive Planning**: Encourage a more holistic approach to transportation planning that considers the integration of bike lanes with other forms of transit. Ensuring connectivity between biking, public transport, and pedestrian pathways is essential for a functional and efficient transportation network. 6. **Long-term Vision for Cycling**: Advocate for a long-term vision that accommodates the growing interest in cycling. This includes investing in safe, accessible bike infrastructure that meets the needs of all users, from casual riders to those who rely on cycling for daily commutes. 7. **Climate Change and Public Health Benefits**: Mention the alignment of bike lane infrastructure with climate action goals and public health efforts. Promoting cycling can lead to reduced carbon emissions and improved air quality, benefiting overall community health. 8. **Potential Economic Benefits**: Highlight the potential economic benefits of cycling infrastructure, such as increased foot traffic to local businesses and lower transportation costs for residents.
Shefaza Esmail	Green	No	Municipalities have a better understanding of their area's needs than the province. We have qualified staff working on this, there is no need to add bureaucratic red-tape to ensure safety of all who use the road - cyclists, vehicles, buses, and pedestrians.
Catherine Fife	New Democratic	No	The Ford government has declared a dangerous culture war on cyclists that will put lives at risk and make congestion worse by reducing safe and efficient transportation options for people. An Ontario NDP government will immediately repeal Bill 212's harmful and dangerous anti-bike lane provisions, and cancel any contracts to rip out existing bike lanes, using the $48 million savings to help municipalities install new bike lanes across Ontario.
Clayton Moore	Liberal	No	The government best-placed to make decisions on local transportation issues is the one elected by local residents. Like in Waterloo, the residents of Toronto have elected a mayor and city council to make smart, well-informed decisions about what happens in their city with their tax dollars. Instead of allowing them to govern themselves, Doug Ford is choosing to spend millions of dollars from Ontarians all across the province to redevelop the streets of Toronto again. The Ontario Liberals believe in building a transit network that allows all Ontarians to get around in whatever way is best for them. When policy issues become so granular that they come down to individual streets in a municipality, it is clear that that municipality is the best-placed to make smart, well-informed decisions for its residents.

Kitchener GO

Metrolinx has been talking about and working towards two-way, all-day, all-week GO train service between Kitchener and Toronto for a decade, but there’s still no clear timeline for it. There are no provincial plans for extending GO rail to Cambridge.

How will you hold Metrolinx accountable to delivering all-day, two-way, all-week GO train service to Waterloo Region?

Cambridge

Candidate	Party	Response
Rob Deutschmann	Liberal	Arrange for meetings and ask for frequent updates and report back to the community every step of the way.
Carla Johnson	Green	Metrolinx would need more than just me holding then accountable. It would require a concerted effort by a strong team overseeing and ensuring their goals are met and align with the needs of the people in Ontario.

Kitchener Centre

Candidate	Party	Response
Aislinn Clancy	Green	I've already been pushing hard for that as MPP in the one year I was elected after the 2023 by-election, I held a press conference with Green MP Mike Morrice last year on all day two way GO and have a relationship with Metrolinx where we meet quarterly on updates. I am eager leverage that existing relationship and continue fighting for that if re-elected.
Colleen James	Liberal	Since Metrolinx is a provincial agency, pushing the Ontario government (especially the Minister of Transportation) is critical. I will Call for transparency on funding, project timelines, and milestones. As your MPP advocate for the project. Which I have done as in my role as regional councillor. I will continue to work with municipal and regional councils to present a united front in demanding faster progress. I will demand Clear Timelines & Reporting: Calling on Metrolinx to publish regular progress updates, including infrastructure improvements, negotiations with CN Rail, and schedule commitments. I will request Auditor General Oversight and advocate for the Ontario Auditor General to review delays and spending on the project to ensure accountability. Finally I will push for legislative measures: If elected, introduce or support motions that mandate clearer deadlines and public reporting on transit infrastructure commitments.
Paul Simoes	New Blue Party	I would advocate for increased transparency and regular reporting on project timelines and budgets. This includes requiring Metrolinx to provide clear, publicly accessible updates on the progress of service expansions and any challenges encountered. By ensuring that Metrolinx maintains open communication with the public and stakeholders, we can promote accountability and work towards the timely and cost-effective implementation of enhanced GO train services for the region.
Brooklin Wallis	New Democratic	Not backing down. I'll be taking the train every day to Queen's Park, so I'll never forget that we need better service!

Kitchener South—Hespeler

Candidate	Party	Response
Jeff Donkersgoed	New Democratic	The Ontario NDP have already been advocating for years to ensure two-way, all-day, all-week GO train service occurs between Kitchener and Toronto. Should we form government, we will work hard to ensure it happens, as well as advance planning for expanded GO rail service to Cambridge.
Ismail Mohamed	Liberal	This is a huge issue that this PC government has failed to solve for our region time and time again. Myself and the Liberal Party of Ontario will go straight to the source and advocate for this region, while holding Metrolinx accountable for better service in our communities. It will be necessary to set up a consultation process so we can know the best, community and municipality-informed methods, to bring the increased GO rail service and connect Cambridge to the rest of the province. We will work to deliver a clear timeline and work to expand our GO rail for citizens in Cambridge. Much like other projects, this is long overdue - 10 years and still no concrete action to get the service our community needs is unacceptable.
John Soule	New Blue Party	o hold Metrolinx accountable for delivering all-day, two-way, all-week GO train service to Waterloo Region, I would focus on the following strategies: 1. Demand Clear Timelines and Milestones Metrolinx has been discussing this expansion for over a decade with little tangible progress. I would push for a firm timeline with publicly available milestones and regular progress updates on track improvements, agreements with CN (which owns key sections of the rail line), and service expansions. 2. Leverage Political and Public Pressure The lack of action is unacceptable. I would work with regional leaders, businesses, and community advocates to apply pressure and ensure this remains a priority issue. A coordinated effort will make it harder for Metrolinx to delay further. 3. Push for Track and Infrastructure Upgrades One of the biggest obstacles is track availability. I would press Metrolinx to secure dedicated rail corridors and make the necessary improvements to eliminate reliance on CN’s freight schedule. 4. Advocate for Cambridge Inclusion With no clear GO rail plans for Cambridge, I would push for Cambridge to be formally included in regional transit discussions and future rail expansion plans, ensuring it is not left behind. 5. Demand Transparency and Public Accountability I would push for regular public updates, independent audits, and greater oversight of Metrolinx’s planning and execution. If delays persist, Metrolinx should be held responsible with enforceable commitments and clear consequences for failing to meet deadlines. This project has been stalled for far too long, and Metrolinx must finally deliver on its promises to Waterloo Region.

Kitchener—Conestoga

Candidate	Party	Response
Joe Gowing	Liberal	Yes. I would push to get this to happen. We need to expand our transit to connect all of Ontario.
Jodi Szimanski	New Democratic	Ford has promised this every election - including this one. I believe that if Metrolinx doesn't move forward that you withhold funding and/or use fines.

Waterloo

Candidate	Party	Response
Suja Biber	New Blue	1. **Support for Active Transportation**: Emphasize the importance of active transportation options, such as biking, in creating a sustainable and healthy urban environment. Highlight the benefits of bike lanes for reducing traffic congestion and promoting emissions-free commuting. 2. **Concerns Over Reduced Infrastructure**: Express your concerns about the removal of bike lanes on major streets in Toronto. Highlight how this could negatively impact cyclists' safety and discourage bike usage, ultimately hindering efforts to increase cycling as a viable transportation option. 3. **Need for Local Autonomy**: Advocate for municipal autonomy in making decisions about local infrastructure. Local governments are better positioned to understand and address the specific needs of their communities, and the requirement for provincial approval may hinder timely and effective decision-making. 4. **Encouraging Community Engagement**: Suggest that community input should be solicited when making decisions about bike lanes and infrastructure changes. Engaging residents can lead to more informed decisions that reflect the desires of the community. 5. **Call for Comprehensive Planning**: Encourage a more holistic approach to transportation planning that considers the integration of bike lanes with other forms of transit. Ensuring connectivity between biking, public transport, and pedestrian pathways is essential for a functional and efficient transportation network. 6. **Long-term Vision for Cycling**: Advocate for a long-term vision that accommodates the growing interest in cycling. This includes investing in safe, accessible bike infrastructure that meets the needs of all users, from casual riders to those who rely on cycling for daily commutes. 7. **Climate Change and Public Health Benefits**: Mention the alignment of bike lane infrastructure with climate action goals and public health efforts. Promoting cycling can lead to reduced carbon emissions and improved air quality, benefiting overall community health. 8. **Potential Economic Benefits**: Highlight the potential economic benefits of cycling infrastructure, such as increased foot traffic to local businesses and lower transportation costs for residents.
Shefaza Esmail	Green	There are two ways to hold Metrolinx accountable - through contracted services (negotiation) and through public pressure (to show there is demand and we need to provide supply). I intend to use both as an incentive to ensure that these services are provided. I will also work closely with Metrolinx and their staff to ensure we can overcome any barriers to providing these services, as it is possible that there are design/system inefficiencies, technical or human resource needs, or other such barriers.
Catherine Fife	New Democratic	No	Frequent two-way all-way GO rail service to Kitchener and Guelph simply has not been a priority for the Ford government or the Liberal government before them. While there are complexities in expanding passenger service along a rail corridor that is partially owned by a private freight rail company, the Ontario government has the ability to deliver this service much more quickly if it chose to. An NDP government will end the delays and get this project back on track. We will also end the secrecy and give the people of Waterloo Region, Guelph and other communities along this important rail corridor a clear timeline for when this service will finally begin running.
Clayton Moore	Liberal	No	Waterloo Region has waited long enough. Metrolinx has been talking about two-way, all-day GO service for over a decade, but we still don’t have a clear timeline. That’s not good enough. As your MPP, I’ll demand full transparency from Metrolinx—clear updates, public reporting, and no more vague promises. I’ll push the province to invest in the infrastructure upgrades needed to get this done and work with local leaders to keep the pressure on. This isn’t just about transit—it’s about opportunity. Better connections to the GTA attract businesses, support innovation, and help our region thrive. As MPP, I’ll make sure Waterloo doesn’t get passed over again. It’s time to deliver the transit we’ve been promised.

Municipal Transit Operations Funding

In Waterloo Region, Grand River Transit’s Business Plan for 2025-2030 will include a 10 minute frequent transit network, overnight buses, and expanded transit to the townships. Upper level government funding increases the likelihood of ambitious plans like this getting off the ground.

Transit construction projects attract upper level government interest as a visible investment, but in recent decades in Canada, they have had less interest in providing the reliable operational funding which enables higher service levels. Currently the province only provides support through the gas tax fund, and municipalities have to support the majority through property taxes.

Will you support increasing provincial funding for municipal transit operations and maintenance?

Cambridge

Candidate	Party	Response	Extra comments
Rob Deutschmann	Liberal	Yes
Carla Johnson	Green	Yes	The province must get back supporting all our public services and transit is a vital service. The provincial government's job is to ensure a well networked transportation system across the province and beyond.

Kitchener Centre

Candidate	Party	Response	Extra comments
Aislinn Clancy	Green	Yes	Yes yes yes. Check our fully costed platform, the first amongst the four parties to actually release one: https://files.ontariogreens.ca/platform/gpo-platform-en.pdf
Colleen James	Liberal	Yes
Paul Simoes	New Blue Party	Yes	Investing in public transit can lead to reduced traffic congestion, improved air quality, and enhanced economic opportunities. Studies have shown that Canada's existing transit systems provide at least $19 billion in economic benefits annually, including significant savings for households on vehicle operating costs and reductions in traffic collision expenses. To ensure that increased provincial funding is utilized effectively, I advocate for implementing rigorous oversight measures, including comprehensive cost-benefit analyses and regular audits. This ensures that investments in public transit deliver tangible benefits to the community and represent a responsible use of taxpayer funds.
Brooklin Wallis	New Democratic	Yes

Kitchener South—Hespeler

Candidate	Party	Response	Extra comments
Jeff Donkersgoed	New Democratic	Yes	The Ontario NDP is committed to cost chare municipal transit operating funding 50-50 to improve reliability and affordability.
Ismail Mohamed	Liberal	Yes	Our Liberal Party is committed to allocating the funds back to the community to support our underfunded transit systems across Ontario. The PCs have historically taken money from Ontarians and invested into projects that only serve special interests, not the people in communities that have been long underserved. I will advocate for allocation of funding which has previously been taken from taxpayers in our region, so we can bring it back to the community and invest in the projects and infrastructure that matters. Expanding to our townships and auxiliary villages/towns is very important. Many people who work in these areas have limited ability to get to their place of work, and I understand the townships have asked for this for some time, but without enough resources, it has yet to happen. I understand the importance of advocating for my riding, but I also understand advocating for the issues that affect our neighbouring communities is just as important. Some residents in my community may be affected by lack of service to our townships, and I will work to advocate for them. Lastly, we have to keep our local services operating smoothly and efficiently. One bus out could mean the difference for someone making it on time for work, a job interview, or an important medical appointment, and we can’t have that.
John Soule	New Blue Party	No

Kitchener—Conestoga

Candidate	Party	Response	Extra comments
Joe Gowing	Liberal	Yes	I believe we need to look at a Provincial transit plan.
Jodi Szimanski	New Democratic	Yes	Fewer cars on the road and less congestion is a good thing for the cities so I would support making sure that these services run and keep costs down for riders.

Waterloo

Candidate	Party	Response	Extra comments
Suja Biber	New Blue	Yes	municipal transit operations funding, particularly in relation to Grand River Transit’s plans for 2025-2030, you might consider the following points: 1. **Importance of Sustainable Funding**: Stress the need for stable and predictable operational funding from upper levels of government. This funding is crucial for maintaining and enhancing service levels, especially as transit demand increases. 2. **Support for Ambitious Projects**: Highlight how reliable funding can help realize ambitious projects like the proposed 10-minute frequent transit network and overnight bus service, ultimately improving public transit access for residents across the region. 3. **Equity in Funding Distribution**: Advocate for a more equitable distribution of funding across municipalities. Urban and rural areas alike should be able to benefit from operational funding to ensure equitable access to transit services. 4. **Encouragement for Partnerships**: Suggest that upper levels of government create partnerships with municipalities to co-fund operational costs. This collaborative approach can lead to innovative solutions and enhanced service delivery. 5. **Investing in Public Health and Environment**: Emphasize that improved transit funding is not just about transportation; it also contributes to public health by reducing reliance on cars and decreasing congestion, as well as mitigating climate change by reducing emissions. 6. **Community Engagement**: Recommend actively involving the community in shaping transit plans, as local input can lead to more effective service models that meet the specific needs of residents. 7. **The Role of Technology**: Encourage the incorporation of technology in transit operations to enhance efficiency and service delivery. Funding should also be allocated for technology improvements to provide real-time information and optimize routing. 8. **Financial Viability of Transit Services**: Discuss the financial viability of transit systems. Increased service levels and reliability can lead to higher ridership, which in turn generates more revenue and reduces the burden on property taxes. 9. **Long-standing Investment**: Advocate for long-term investment in public transit as part of a broader infrastructure strategy. Investment in transit not only improves accessibility but also stimulates local economies and job creation. 10. **Encouragement of Active Transportation**: Mention that supporting transit operations can promote active transportation modes such as biking and walking, as convenient transit services often encourage such behaviors. By including these points in your comments, you can effectively advocate for enhanced municipal transit operations funding to support ambitious and sustainable transit initiatives in Waterloo Region.
Shefaza Esmail	Green	Yes	Municipalities have had to shoulder the financial burden of ensuring continued access to public services without much support from the province for much too long. And to add, the province has instead been adding barriers to the ambitious plans and targets municipalities have set for emissions reductions and ensuring fast, easy, and frequent public transit that connects people to their needs at all times. I absolutely support increasing provincial funding for municipal transit operations and maintenance. I take the ION and connecting bus everyday. I have had to go over piles of snow with my 18-month old strapped to me just to get on the bus. Sidewalks being cleared and having dedicated clearing for bus stops is so critical to ensuring people continue to have access to transit services. The GRT did great with what they had but they need better supports and help with planning from people who use these services so we can remove/reduce barriers by design.
Catherine Fife	New Democratic	Yes	Because of provincial funding cuts to municipal transit operations under PC and Liberal governments, local transit service has steadily gotten worse in Ontario, while fares have risen faster than inflation. Marit Stiles and the NDP will fix local transit by restoring 50% provincial funding for municipal transit net operational costs, immediately enabling improved transit service that is more reliable, frequent, convenient and affordable, while boosting ridership and easing congestion for everyone.
Clayton Moore	Liberal	No	Waterloo Region has invested in building a strong transit network—but municipalities can’t do it alone. For too long, the province has downloaded responsibilities like transit, housing, and social services without providing the stable funding needed to sustain them. The Ontario Liberals are committed to being a real partner to municipalities, but that means more than just increasing operational funding—it means fixing the root of the problem. Instead of continuing the cycle of municipalities relying on unpredictable provincial transfers, we need to upload more responsibilities to ensure cities have access to the services they need, without being forced to stretch property taxes to cover essential costs. That’s why we’ve committed to uploading the costs of the Ottawa LRT, ensuring cities have the resources to focus on local priorities, including transit. Municipalities should have the flexibility to determine how they invest in their communities—transit should be an integral part of that, but the province needs to take on its fair share of responsibility instead of offering Band-Aid solutions. As your MPP, I’ll fight to ensure Waterloo Region has the resources and autonomy to build the transit system we deserve—not just temporary funding, but a real commitment to sustainable, long-term support.