Post

Week in review: August 5, 2017

Posted
By Mike Boos
4 min read
Week in review: August 5, 2017

Subscribe to get weekly updated delivered directly to your inbox!

Consultations, feedback, and events

Civic pride

Local researcher Robin Mazumder writes about how the experience of people walking and cycling impacts civic pride. He worries that the state of affairs for people walking and cycling in Kitchener hurts the city’s brand - and his own desire to live here.

Eliminating traffic deaths

Kitchener is considering lowering speed limits to 40 km/h for roads with sharrows. While they could be lower - fatality rates rise dramatically at speeds above 30 km/h, and things work best if cars and bikes can move at close to the same speeds - it’s a step in the right direction, provided it is accompanied by routine enforcement and safer road design.

With ION construction nearly complete, it’s become apparent there are some dangerous places to cross the tracks for people on bikes, where the tight angles allow tires to fall into the groove. New research suggests that slips can be avoided if crossing at 60 degrees or greater - something the Region should consider to help guide people on bikes across the new tracks.

  • Harris re-issues call for consistent roundabout rules [Kitchener Post]
  • Traffic death increase caused by speeding, says new study [Curbed]
  • Cell phones don’t make walking dangerous - car-based cities do [Streetsblog]
  • More people riding bikes makes cycling safer for everyone, major new study finds [Cycling Weekly]

Networks

After years of wandering aimlessly through a few different trail way-finding sign designs, Kitchener is finally finding its bearings and… consulting with residents next year. Yeah.

Waterloo is preparing to widen and improve the Laurel Trail through Waterloo Park September 1 to next spring, and is suggesting a detour in the meantime.

While this Globe and Mail op-ed focuses on Toronto’s bike network woes, our local municipalities have also been really good at building lots of cycling infrastructure where it’s easy - but not necessarily where it’s most needed:

“Politicians don’t usually say that the safety of residents who cycle must be sacrificed for the convenience of residents who drive; instead, they make vague comments about needing to put bike lanes where they are reasonable or make sense – mythical places that are stand-ins for bike lanes where they matter.”

New guidelines

Perceptions of cycling

  • Media reports on cyclist fatalities shift blame from drivers to riders, says researcher [Road.cc]
  • Cyclists and the expectation of perfection [Tim Querengesser]

Blocking the bike lane

Toronto adds two new full-time bike lane parking enforcers, while we in Waterloo Region wish our cities would try to actively enforce bike lanes - or even issue tickets to delivery companies when infractions are reported. Of course, if we had protected bike lanes everywhere, we wouldn’t need enforcement.

  • Spike in tickets for drivers parked in bike lanes [CBC Ottawa]
  • Hamilton cyclists say vehicles should stay out of their bike lanes [CBC Hamilton]

Transit

  • The dangers of elite projection [Human Transit]
  • Older people will need much better transit [CityLab]
  • Waiting for the light: picking up the pace on bus signal priority in NYC [TransitCenter]
  • How will autonomous vehicles change public transit? [Remix]

Land use

Statistics Canada released a new batch of data from the Census, and the big takeaway is that family sizes are getting smaller and more people are living on their own. What does this mean? With smaller households, “stable” neighbourhoods are actually getting smaller and won’t be able to hold as many people. This will lead to the need - and desire - for more compact forms of housing.

news
This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.